With a little thinner fan it would have gone in without issue. The distance between the rear PCIe slots and the front fans is about. My original plan was to also install the MSI RTX 3080 Surpim in the Torrent Compact. The Noctua D-15 fits in here without an issue and should keep the 10900K pretty cool at stock conditions. So I went for an air cooling build instead. If I would have done that, it would have cleared easily. It never occurred to me while I was test fitting the cooler to add 25mm or so to the depth. It hit the underneath of the top of the case just behind the front I/O panels. However, I started test fitting it without the fans mounted to the front of the radiator, as in I was placing the radiator on the front mounts for the 120mm and the 140mm fans. SEM images revealed slightly elongated cells in the periphery of the toe pads in the torrent frogs, with straightened channels in between them which could facilitate drainage of excess fluid underneath the pad.So here goes, originally, I had planned to install a 360mm AIO for the CPU. The superior abilities of the torrent frogs were thus due to the large contact area they used on steep, overhanging surfaces. Probing small areas of the different skin parts with a force transducer revealed that forces declined significantly in wet conditions, with only minor differences between the frog species. In the tree frogs, the belly and thighs often detached on steeper slopes, whereas the torrent frogs increased the use of these areas as the slope angle increased. Both frog species not only used the contact area of their pads to adhere, but also large parts of their belly and thigh skin. Using a transparent platform where areas of contact are illuminated, we measured the contact area of frogs during platform rotation under dry conditions. In contrast, under both low and high flow rate conditions, the torrent frogs performed significantly better, even adhering under conditions where their toe pads were submerged in water, abolishing the meniscus that underlies capillarity. On dry, smooth surfaces, both frog species stayed attached to overhanging slopes equally well. We challenged both frog species to cling to a platform which could be tilted from the horizontal to an upside-down orientation, testing the frogs on different levels of roughness and water flow. This study compares the adhesive capabilities of a torrent frog to a tree frog, investigating possible adaptations for adhesion under wet conditions. Tree frogs climb smooth surfaces utilising capillary forces arising from an air-fluid interface around their toe pads, whereas torrent frogs are able to climb in wet environments near waterfalls where the integrity of the meniscus is at risk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |